Atmospheric Modeling

An important piece of news was the deployment of up to a dozen new teams from EPA to monitor potential radioactivity from Japan arriving on the West Coast. Hawaii’s almost mid-Pacific location probably means that a team is deployed there.

Oddly a discipline that is not is not always on the front burner in Homeland Security and Emergency Management may be extremely important. The large reduction of loss of life in the last century from hurricanes was largely due to the development of the meterology profession in reality an outgrowth and necessity once mankind traveled in the air. Strangely even the Galveston Event in which several thousand were killed [the true total is estimated at 6,000 and many more may have been lost] and the early efforts to understand that type of event will capture your imagination if you read “Issac’s Storm” for which at the moment I blank on the authors name.

If my understanding is correct the President erroneosly reported that the NRC [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] would be monitoring the atmospheric radiation but NOAA and EPA are both involved. With the passage of 9 days that should be adequate time for readings to start to reflect the Japanese events. So time will tell.

Perhaps of interest is that spinach and other vegetable crops are now reflecting higher levels of radiation in Japan. So clearly the hazard exists in both the so-called Plume Exposure Pathway [the 10 mile ring around nuclear power plants in the US] and the so-called Ingestion Pathway [the 50 mile ring in the US] for putting livestock on stored feed and monitoring of crops for increased radiation.

Interestingly US Forces are using a 50 mile ring without protective gear and the US continues to monitor radiation outside a 19 mile ring around the impacted sites.

Very limited information in English is available on Protective Action Recommendations and while joint issuance in both Japanese and English is occurring from the Japanese government at the moment it appears to focus on calming the population not protecting it.

This will be a crucial week for this event and the seriousness of the situation may be reflected in the exposure of emergency workers in the immediate vicinity of the plants trying to restore coolant to both reactors and fuel rod storage ponds. So far the slope has been downhill IMO but again perhaps some turnaround this week. President Obama was also issuing assurance in futuro about safety of the US population demonstrating his poor understanding of the issues or his advisors poor understanding. But it also is true that the great probability is increase in longterm cancers not immediate fatalities should radiation travel across the Pacific Ocean.

About vlg338
This entry was posted in Environment. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Atmospheric Modeling

  1. For daily climatological record keeping since 1875 at least here in New England and a reference to substantial storms affecting the US, pls see:

    The ineptness on both sides of the Congressional aisle in this ongoing partisan way must cease and is a matter of national security! We have an executive branch who truly cannot possibly understand the worsening scenario unfolding and beyond their grasp because of their inability to portray the leadership and demand the same of as the present self-fulfilling agenda muddled in continued politicizing has lost sight of our flag now flying upside down and in distress as the world shortly sees far worse than radiation from earthquake damaged related facilities —

    Each state should have in place radiation monitoring as well as I again reiterate, each community should be given emergency monies to purchase MRE and water with such stored in high schools or cmmunity centers for preparedness for inevitable challenges whatever they may be ahead should be initiated now — We must have a designated shelter or two in each community funded by the federal government to keep the majority of each community safe in any such events — preparedness – our no. 1 community preparedness requirement —

  2. We here at the Blue Hill Observatory – – would very much like to be chosen as a location by federal authorities to establish and monitor radiation in the Boston area. We feel our unique location atop Big Blue and our reliable and longest daily discipline in maintaining hourly climatological record keeping since 1875 presents us as a good candidate for such monitoring 24×7.

    For those federal authorities willing to discuss subject merits and to confer with us at Blue Hill, pls contact Christopher Tingus at

    Thank you —

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s